Now onto the not so good-
I ended up returning it because I failed to realize or research the fact that the FPS was 2.5. Since I hadn't owned a DSLR prior to this I didn't have a frame of reference but when i used the continuous shooting mode it felt extremely slow. I don't mean and certainly don't want that to sound like a bad thing, in fact it didn't really hinder most of my shooting. However, the expectation was there and gave me the impression that it was sub standard to other brands. I had used a Nikon D40 and Canon T1i and both had continuous shooting and it made me expect that from a comparable DSLR. Again, it doesn't really mean much, but it's a nice to have. Also, the Battery didn't seem like it had a full days worth of shooting in it. I took it out one after noon and walked around and by 5pm it was out of battery life. I had only taken 50 shots and i don't really use the live view and so I felt that it again was sub "pro tools."
So I looked around for accessories (battery grip- things like that) and i had a tough time finding them. Other brands had loads of accessories and affordable prices but Sony seemed to have super expensive prices or the alternative- one to two cheap options which weren't worth the trouble of ordering.
Looking back now- I probably should have kep the Sony. The price was incredible and I could have done with the 2.5 FPS. I'm still shopping for a DSLR and the prices seemed to have just shot up to a price just a little too out of reach. If your looking for a Sub $600 DSLR camera, you really can't beat the Sony a390. I've done a comparison to the Canon T1i, T2i, The Nikon D500. All are great cameras, but all of the rest are over $600, and if you want the most for you can get for the money- the Sony is the right choice. I posted photos taken with the kit lens. If your like me, thats what you want to see.
Review by R. Fernandez
No comments:
Post a Comment